🚀
Smart Contract Auditors Space
  • 👋Welcome to the Smart Contract Auditors Space
  • Smart Contract Vulnerabilities
    • Anchor
      • FV-ANC-1 Arithmetic Operations
        • FV-ANC-1-CL1 Overflow/underflow in arithmetic operations
        • FV-ANC-1-CL2 Division by zero
        • FV-ANC-1-CL3 Arbitrary rounding
      • FV-ANC-2 Signer Checks
        • FV-ANC-2-CL1 Unvalidated signers
        • FV-ANC-2-CL2 No is_signer check
      • FV-ANC-3 Account/Ownership Validations
        • FV-ANC-3-CL1 Trying to modify an account without checking if it's writeable
        • FV-ANC-3-CL2 Trying to access account data without ownership checks
        • FV-ANC-3-CL3 Usage of UncheckedAccount without manual ownership check
        • FV-ANC-3-CL4 Usage of UncheckedAccount without manual signer check
        • FV-ANC-3-CL5 No is_initialized check when operating on an account
        • FV-ANC-3-CL6 Missing account constraints
        • FV-ANC-3-CL7 Duplicate mutable accounts
        • FV-ANC-3-CL8 Using ctx.remaining_accounts without manual ownership check
        • FV-ANC-3-CL9 Using ctx.remaining_accounts without manual discriminator check
        • FV-ANC-3-CL10 Using ctx.remaining_accounts without non-zero data check
        • FV-ANC-3-CL11 No reload after account mutation
        • FV-ANC-3-CL12 Not validating a set address
      • FV-ANC-4 PDA Security
        • FV-ANC-4-CL1 Using create_program_address
      • FV-ANC-5 Cross-Program Invocation (CPI)
        • FV-ANC-5-CL1 Lack of validation of external program before CPI
        • FV-ANC-5-CL2 CPI without signer seeds
        • FV-ANC-5-CL3 Not unsetting signer status before a CPI
        • FV-ANC-5-CL4 Passing unnecessary accounts to CPIs
      • FV-ANC-6 Error Handling
        • FV-ANC-6-CL1 Unclear error messages
      • FV-ANC-7 Token Operations
        • FV-ANC-7-CL1 Unvalidated token mint & owner
        • FV-ANC-7-CL2 Using init with an ATA
      • FV-ANC-8 System Account Validation
        • FV-ANC-8-CL1 Unvalidated sysvar address
      • FV-ANC-9 Type Cosplay
        • FV-ANC-9-CL1 Not using discriminators to validate account types
        • FV-ANC-9-CL2 Account structures without discriminators
      • FV-ANC-10 Closing accounts
        • FV-ANC-10-CL1 Closing accounts without zeroing data & setting a closed discriminator
        • FV-ANC-10-CL2 Operations on accounts marked as closed
        • FV-ANC-10-CL3 Unintended closure by close constraint
    • Solidity
      • FV-SOL-1 Reentrancy
        • FV-SOL-1-C1 Single Function
        • FV-SOL-1-C2 Cross Function
        • FV-SOL-1-C3 Cross Contract
        • FV-SOL-1-C4 Cross Chain
        • FV-SOL-1-C5 Dynamic
        • FV-SOL-1-C6 Read-Only
      • FV-SOL-2 Precision Errors
        • FV-SOL-2-C1 Token Decimals
        • FV-SOL-2-C2 Floating Point
        • FV-SOL-2-C3 Rounding
        • FV-SOL-2-C4 Division by Zero
        • FV-SOL-2-C5 Time-Based
      • FV-SOL-3 Arithmetic Errors
        • FV-SOL-3-C1 Overflow and Underflow
        • FV-SOL-3-C2 Sign Extension
        • FV-SOL-3-C3 Truncation in Type Casting
        • FV-SOL-3-C4 Misuse of Environment Variables
      • FV-SOL-4 Bad Access Control
        • FV-SOL-4-C1 Using tx.origin for Authorization
        • FV-SOL-4-C2 Unrestricted Role Assignment
        • FV-SOL-4-C3 Lack of Multi-Signature for Crucial Operations
      • FV-SOL-5 Logic Errors
        • FV-SOL-5-C1 Boundary Misalignment
        • FV-SOL-5-C2 Incorrect Conditionals
        • FV-SOL-5-C3 Improper State Transitions
        • FV-SOL-5-C4 Misordered Calculations
        • FV-SOL-5-C5 Event Misreporting
      • FV-SOL-6 Unchecked Returns
        • FV-SOL-6-C1 Unchecked Call Return
        • FV-SOL-6-C2 Unchecked Transfer Return
        • FV-SOL-6-C3 Silent Fail
        • FV-SOL-6-C4 False Positive Success Assumption
        • FV-SOL-6-C5 Partial Execution with No Rollback
        • FV-SOL-6-C6 False Contract Existence Assumption
      • FV-SOL-7 Proxy Insecurities
        • FV-SOL-7-C1 delegatecall Storage Collision
        • FV-SOL-7-C2 Function Selector Collision
        • FV-SOL-7-C3 Centralized Update Control
        • FV-SOL-7-C4 Uninitialized Proxy
      • FV-SOL-8 Slippage
        • FV-SOL-8-C1 Price Manipulation
        • FV-SOL-8-C2 Front-Running
        • FV-SOL-8-C3 Insufficient Liquidity
        • FV-SOL-8-C4 Unexpected Gas Increase
      • FV-SOL-9 Unbounded Loops
        • FV-SOL-9-C1 Dynamic Array
        • FV-SOL-9-C2 Unrestricted Mapping
        • FV-SOL-9-C3 Recursive Calls
        • FV-SOL-9-C4 Reentrancy Loops
        • FV-SOL-9-C5 Nested Loops
      • FV-SOL-10 Oracle Manipulation
        • FV-SOL-10-C1 Incorrect Compounding Mechanism
        • FV-SOL-10-C2 Price Drift
        • FV-SOL-10-C3 Manipulation Through External Markets
        • FV-SOL-10-C4 Time Lags
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • TLDR
  • Game

Was this helpful?

  1. Smart Contract Vulnerabilities
  2. Solidity
  3. FV-SOL-1 Reentrancy

FV-SOL-1-C4 Cross Chain

TLDR

Cross-chain reentrancy involves exploiting asynchronous transactions or inconsistencies between two blockchains that communicate with each other.

In this type of vulnerability, an attacker leverages the delay or difference in state updates across chains to manipulate the state on one chain based on outdated or unverified information from another chain.

Game

Consider how an attacker might exploit this contract if they can control or manipulate the calls to completeTransfer through cross-chain messaging.

How could an attacker use reentrant calls from one chain to the other to alter the balances in unintended ways?

// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
// Open me in VSCode and really think before opening the hints!
// Add @audit tags wherever suspicious
// Go to the solidity docs to complete missing knowledge of what's happening here
// Solve by drafting a fix!
pragma solidity ^0.8.0;

contract CrossChainBridge {
    mapping(address => uint256) public balances;

    event TransferInitiated(address indexed user, uint256 amount, string targetChain);
    event TransferCompleted(address indexed user, uint256 amount);

    // Function to start transferring funds to another chain
    function initiateTransfer(uint256 amount, string memory targetChain) public {
        require(balances[msg.sender] >= amount, "Insufficient balance");
        balances[msg.sender] -= amount;
        emit TransferInitiated(msg.sender, amount, targetChain);
        // Assume the amount is now locked, awaiting confirmation from the target chain
    }

    // Function to receive funds back from the other chain
    function completeTransfer(address user, uint256 amount) public {
        balances[user] += amount;
        emit TransferCompleted(user, amount);
    }
}

Cross-chain reentrancy often involves delayed state changes and trust assumptions about calls between chains.

Look closely at completeTransfer and consider what happens if the function is called repeatedly or unexpectedly, especially if there’s no verification of the source

Think about how an attacker could use completeTransfer to manipulate balances without sending actual funds from the other chain.

Since balances[user] is updated directly in completeTransfer, consider what could happen if they initiate a transfer and then repeatedly trigger completeTransfer from the "other chain."

function completeTransfer(address user, uint256 amount) public {
    require(isTrustedSource(msg.sender), "Untrusted source"); // Fix: Example verification
    require(!isProcessedTransaction(user, amount), "Already processed"); // Fix 2: Track processed transfers

    balances[user] += amount;
    markTransactionProcessed(user, amount); // Mark transaction as processed
    emit TransferCompleted(user, amount);
}
PreviousFV-SOL-1-C3 Cross ContractNextFV-SOL-1-C5 Dynamic

Last updated 6 months ago

Was this helpful?